Measured measurement

Short impact summary

"Measured measurement," published in 2009 in Nature Physics by Markus Aspelmeyer, explores topics centered on quantum and statistical physics. The article has accrued 10 citations and has an unusual online presence with 108 Wikipedia mentions, reflecting notable interest from a public knowledge platform. The citing landscape reveals diverse venues including Chinese Physics B and Optics Communications, indicating the paper’s influence extends into various physics subfields.

Full narrative

This article, "Measured measurement," appeared in the high-impact journal Nature Physics in 2009 and was authored by Markus Aspelmeyer from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information Innsbruck. While the publisher's landing page and open access status are not available, the article’s DOI (10.1038/nphys1170) anchors it within a reputable publication venue. The relatively modest citation count of 10 shows limited but sustained scholarly attention over more than a decade.

The paper is positioned within core physics disciplines, as indicated by OpenAlex concept scores emphasizing general physics (0.89), quantum (0.52), and quantum tomography (0.49). Secondary concepts like quantum measurement (0.46) and statistical physics (0.33) further contextualize its focus, linking it closely to foundational quantum mechanics and measurement theory, which aligns with the author’s institutional expertise in quantum optics.

Citing works come exclusively from journal articles (10), with notable repeated citations from Chinese Physics B and Optics Communications (two each), demonstrating engagement in both quantum and applied optics communities. The citation timeline from 2009 through 2019 shows a steady citation pattern, while the citing countries—China (5), United States (4), Czech Republic (3), and the Netherlands (3)—suggest an international impact, including significant attention in Asia and North America.

Online attention for the article is strongly characterized by 108 mentions on Wikipedia, as reflected by Crossref Event Data. This level of presence in a widely accessed knowledge repository suggests the article’s concepts have permeated public or educational discourse, although there are no supporting or contradicting scite statements recorded (1 mention only), indicating a cautious citation environment without direct claim validation or dispute.

Open access availability and direct publisher landing page links are not available, limiting immediate accessibility for reuse or further dissemination via open channels. The absence of an identified best open-access full text may constrain broader uptake, especially outside institutions with subscription access to Nature Portfolio journals, potentially affecting the paper’s reach despite its conceptual relevance.

Future qualitative follow-up could utilize scite’s expanded citation context to analyze how the article’s findings are interpreted or debated in citing literature, although current data shows only one neutral mention and no supporting or contradicting statements. Such an analysis would further clarify the article's role in quantum physics discourse beyond its modest citation count and significant Wikipedia integration.