Elizabeth Bishop and the Literary Archive

Short impact summary

Elizabeth Bishop and the Literary Archive (2020), published by Lever Press and hosted on Fulcrum, engages with themes in art, history, art history, and literature, positioning it at the intersection of these humanities disciplines. With 41 citations noted in OpenAlex, the book shows evidence of scholarly engagement. While it has modest public visibility marked by a single newsfeed event, the work contributes meaningfully to literary and archival studies despite limited usage and open educational resource presence.

Full narrative

Published in 2020 by Lever Press and available through the Fulcrum platform, Elizabeth Bishop and the Literary Archive situates itself firmly within interdisciplinary humanities discourse, connecting art, history, art history, and literature. These concept labels indicate the book’s focus on both literary analysis and archival methodologies, underscoring its relevance for scholars interested in material and intellectual histories. The combination of these thematic strands contributes to ongoing conversations about literary archives and their critical interpretation in the early 21st century.

The book has accumulated 41 citing works according to OpenAlex, suggesting a moderate level of scholarly uptake. This citation footprint demonstrates that the book has found an audience within academic circles, supporting its positioning as a meaningful resource in literary and archival studies. While 41 citations do not indicate widespread disciplinary transformation, they reflect sustained engagement across related fields. The inferred role of “scholarly uptake” with a strength score of 0.6 further anchors this impact, highlighting that the book serves as a substantive reference within specialized academic communities.

Regarding public visibility, the metadata reveals a single documented event sourced from a newsfeed, with event data dated on its initial publication date of April 7, 2020. This limited event count and source diversity indicate relatively modest visibility beyond academic readership. The “public visibility signal” with a moderate strength of 0.5 underscores that public attention exists but is restrained. No further events were recorded thereafter, and there are no mentions in OER platforms or additional media, which suggests that the book’s broader cultural penetration remains limited.

Usability metrics such as downloads and open educational resource listings are notably absent or unavailable, with no download statistics from OAPEN or other platforms. This lack of usage data constrains assessment of the book’s reach among digital readers and educators. The single hosting platform, Fulcrum, with one recorded host count, further signals a concentrated rather than dispersed digital presence. Consequently, while the book enjoys steady scholarly reference, its engagement in educational or open-access contexts appears minimal or is currently undocumented.

In sum, Elizabeth Bishop and the Literary Archive embodies a focused scholarly contribution bridging literary studies and archival research, affirmed by measurable citation activity and thematic depth in key humanities fields. Its public and open educational visibility, however, remains limited according to existing event and usage data. This profile is typical for specialized academic monographs that advance discourse primarily within research communities rather than mainstream or educational outreach. Continued monitoring of citations and additional usage metrics will better clarify its evolving impact.