The Liverpool University Press encompasses 10 works that have collectively generated significant scholarly and public impact. Anchored predominantly in History, Art, and Literature, this collection has amassed a highly concentrated thematic footprint.
Commitment to open knowledge sharing is a defining characteristic of this dataset. A significant portion of this dataset prioritizes accessibility, with 40% of the portfolio available via Open Access.
The impact of these works is geographically and institutionally diverse. Noteworthy engagement extends beyond standard academia, with measurable uptake in the Facility and Government sectors. this portfolio demonstrates both rapid public uptake and sustained relevance as a methodological anchor for future synthesis.
Narrative note: this summary is AI-assisted and generated from structured metadata/signals.
”
No single metric stands in for impact here. Citations, downloads, mentions, teaching and open-access rights are shown side by side, each tagged with the source it came from — read together, not ranked against each other.
Key metrics
664
Total Citations
⭐ 4 in Top 10%
28
Online Mentions
40%
Open Access
4 of 10 works
1
With awards
On the shelf
Digital BookshelfPortfolio
The same collection, ranked by whichever evidence you pick — no one ranking is "the" ranking. Articles and data included, not just books — cover art where it resolves.
A small nod to Bookmetrix's original digital bookshelf.
Open science report card
Open Science IndicatorsOpenAIRE / PRISM
PRISM provides book-level peer-review context signals; missing PRISM data does not imply missing peer review — few OA book publishers have formal open peer review tracked at all.
10%
PRISM Context
100%
OpenAIRE Reach
—
Open Peer Review
Not yet recorded — absence of data, not absence of review.
—
PRISM Peer Reviews
Not yet recorded — absence of data, not absence of review.
OpenAIRE open instances: 20% of works.
Inferred portfolio roles
What the evidence above doesn't capture — cumulative heuristic classification of how this portfolio is actually used, across all works.
Sustainability & policy relevance
4.4
Scholarly uptake
3.9
Reference point for synthesis
1.8
Commercial linkage
1.8
Pedagogical anchor
1.2
Citation & attention landscape
Citation Timeline
Annual citation counts across the portfolio.
Citing SectorsROR
Citation Contextscite
Work TypesOpenAlex
Top VenuesOpenAlex
Community engagement & public discourse
Online Mentions by Platform
Breakdown across platforms for the entire portfolio.
Citing-work affiliations trace back to 38 countries — circle size shows citation count from that country.
Full breakdown, including countries not shown on the map, in the list below.
Top Citing CountriesOpenAlex
Based on author affiliations of citing works — size shows how often each one appears.
United Kingdom (157)United States (115)Australia (29)Germany (12)France (10)Italy (6)Canada (6)Poland (6)Israel (5)Ireland (5)Spain (5)Mexico (3)Greece (3)Belgium (2)Chile (2)
Top Citing InstitutionsROR / OpenAlex
Canonical names based on author affiliations — size shows how often each one appears.
University of Oxford (26)University of Warwick (22)University of Bristol (20)Macquarie University (18)University of Cambridge (15)University of Oklahoma (14)The Ohio State University (14)University of Alabama in Huntsville (12)Ohio University (11)Jacksonville State University (10)University of Kent (9)University College London (9)University of Leeds (8)University of Manchester (8)King's College London (8)
Top FundersEurope PMC
Number of distinct works supported — size shows how often each one appears.
Not available.
Contributors
Core AuthorsPortfolio
Authors with more than one work in this dataset.
No authors have multiple works in this dataset.
OA provenance
Open Access Provenance
Primary source used to classify OA per work.
6
Closed/Unknown
3
Publisher-claimed
1
OAPEN
Needs verification
4 of these works are marked OA by publisher metadata but have no DOAB confirmation — a metadata gap, not necessarily a closed-access work.
